Reduce Costs for Compliance by Implementing a Risk-Based Internal Control Solution

  • by Frank Rambo, PhD, Director, Customer Solution Adoption (CSA), EMEA
  • February 4, 2010
Costs for compliance and fraud prevention have risen significantly in recent years and with the current economic situation we’re likely to manage more regulations in the future, further driving costs up. Companies relish efficiency in the GRC space to garner the true benefits of compliance. One means of more efficient compliance is an integrated solution called Risk-Based Internal Control, which helps ensure continuous compliance with regulatory requirements and company policies including government mandates, industry standards, and internal policies.
Key Concept
The integrated solution Risk-Based Internal Control (RBIC) consists of three software products: SAP BusinessObjects Process Control 3.0, SAP BusinessObjects Risk Management 3.0, and SAP BusinessObjects Access Control 5.3. SAP BusinessObjects Process Control represents the cornerpiece of RBIC. Its current 3.0 release has been strongly integrated with SAP BusinessObjects Risk Management 3.0 from a technical architecture as well as a data model perspective. An integration scenario with SAP BusinessObjects Access Control 5.3 allows for the inclusion of segregation of duties analysis into the internal control testing framework of the RBIC solution. However, many key features of RBIC already come with SAP BusinessObjects Process Control and can be operated standalone.

A Risk-Based Internal Control (RBIC) process allows you to integrate functionality of SAP BusinessObjects Process Control 3.0, SAP BusinessObjects Risk Management 3.0, and SAP BusinessObjects Access Control 5.3. In doing so, you streamline the management of risk and compliance. The solution provides the following benefits: 

  • The master data catalog is shared across multiple compliance initiatives and allows for centralized management of relevant master data such as organizational hierarchies, processes, subprocesses, controls, control objectives, risks, and account groups
  • Master data change requests provide a formal change request and approval workflow for master data changes, if required
  • The multi-compliance framework (MCF) supports parallel management of multiple compliance initiatives such as Sarbanes-Oxley, Japan’s version of Sarbanes-Oxley (J-SOX), and FDA drug regulations. This is a key requirement for companies subject to multiple regulations from various countries, regulatory areas, or internal policies.
  • Support of operational compliance initiatives including standardized company-wide FDA compliance processes such as corrective action and preventive action (CAPA) workflows for best practice issue remediation
  • Support of top-down, risk-based scoping according to Audit Standard No.5 by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). This recognized methodology helps narrow down the number of controls in scope for testing based on a materiality and risk analysis. It keeps the costs for control testing under control.
  • The automated rules framework (ARF) enables automated testing based on customer-configured rules or pre-delivered rule content for all core business processes such as financial reporting, order-to-cash, and procure-to-pay. The ARF ensures flexibility and a high degree of automation for internal control testing.
  • Integration of SAP BusinessObjects Process Control and SAP BusinessObjects Risk Management: A user in SAP BusinessObjects Risk Management can propose a new control or assign an existing control as a risk response while completeness and effectiveness of the risk response is evaluated and updated by SAP BusinessObjects Process Control.
  • Support of manual control testing including offline test plans with the SAP Interactive Forms software by Adobe. Testers can work in remote locations offline with their test plans without system connectivity and later upload them into the system.
  • Flexible tabular and graphical reporting and analytics based on Crystal Reports and Xcelsius dashboards supporting drill-down analysis. Users can develop additional reports within the license limitations.
  • Aggregation of Deficiencies (AoD) provides executive management improved visibility and awareness of control deficiencies and their deficiency levels. It provides a higher assurance over the integrity of the compliance program by focusing on improving controls with highest deficiency levels.
  • Automated generation of datasheets providing a summary book in PDF format of all assessments and tests for a given period to auditors to accelerate audits.

The RBIC process consists of three main phases (Figure 1):

Frank Rambo, PhD

Frank Rambo, PhD, is managing a team within SAP’s Customer Solution Adoption (CSA) organization working with customers in the SAP analytics area with the objective to drive adoption of new, innovative solutions. Prior to this position, he worked eight years for SAP Germany as a senior consultant focusing on SAP security and identity management. Before he joined SAP in 1999, Frank worked as a physicist in an international research team. He lives in Hamburg, Germany.

See more by this author


Comments

No comments have been submitted on this article. 


Please log in to post a comment.

To learn more about subscription access to premium content, click here.